Nnamdi Kanu, accused of coup
There is disquiet as Nnamdi Kanu of Radio Biafra has allegedly carried out a coup, overthrowing the defacto “council of elders” of pro-Biafra zionist agitators.
In a recent video provided by the other side, they condemned Nnamdi Kanu who is recorded saying the government was headed Royal Majesty, Honorable Justice Eze Ozubu rtd with the council of elders. He said in the video that he was not leading Biafra. However in recent broadcasts he self assumed title as “leader of Indigenous People of Biafra.”
Nnamdi Kanu was employed as the media arm of the group, however due to his ambitiousness he apparently conducted a silent coup to overthrow the leader Eze Ozubu and the council of elders. In a recent address at world Igbo congress in the US signed off as “leader Indigenous People of Biafra,” thus formerly overthrowing Justice Eze.
Biafra Voice International, BVI, another radio station represents the original IPOB and has been strongly rejecting Nnamdi Kanu’s coup.
The Nnamdi Kanu group has been accused of various forms of terrorism and incitement to murder.
About Bilie and Origin of Radio Biafra
Adolf Emeka Esiri
BHRI: Bilie Human Rights Initiatives. We wont talk about BHRI without mentioning names like Adolf Emeka Esiri, Nnamdi kanu, Nwa Ada Amarachi, Dr Egemba, Steve Ikpa, Alphonsus Uche Mefor and Chidera Akubuo…all these men were today very much accredited to successes of both BHRI and Radio Biafra London. RBL, RBL was a product of BHRI initiative as a media representative of Biafran people now called the Indigenous People Of Biafra. Whereas BHRI as headed by Adolf and his legal colleagues represents the legal rights of the Biafran people but all are parts of both movement as its for Biafran people. This co-existence doesn’t last much due to mistrust, misunderstanding and financial recklessness going on within RBL as the then director were being accused of refusing to render accounts of how he is running the media, and also claim to have personally sponsored the institution of the media financially and otherwise so shouldn’t be questioned of how the station is been run or registered as a limited liability company. Read more about the war within Biafra agitatators
About Bilie and Origin of Radio Biafra
Adolf Emeka Esiri
BHRI: Bilie Human Rights Initiatives. We wont talk about BHRI without mentioning names like Adolf Emeka Esiri, Nnamdi kanu, Nwa Ada Amarachi, Dr Egemba, Steve Ikpa, Alphonsus Uche Mefor and Chidera Akubuo…all these men were today very much accredited to successes of both BHRI and Radio Biafra London. RBL, RBL was a product of BHRI initiative as a media representative of Biafran people now called the Indigenous People Of Biafra. Whereas BHRI as headed by Adolf and his legal colleagues represents the legal rights of the Biafran people but all are parts of both movement as its for Biafran people. This co-existence doesn’t last much due to mistrust, misunderstanding and financial recklessness going on within RBL as the then director were being accused of refusing to render accounts of how he is running the media, and also claim to have personally sponsored the institution of the media financially and otherwise so shouldn’t be questioned of how the station is been run or registered as a limited liability company. Read more about the war within Biafra agitatators
Comments
More Women, Children Rescued As Army Clears Northeast Of Terror
Pastor Adeboye Buys Brand New $65 Million Gulfstream Jet, Starts Luxury Airline
Buhari Hails Ex-PDP Chair Who Said “Boko Haram Is Fighting For Justice”
BREAKING RELIEF: EFCC Reopens Probe Into Aba Moro Immigration Job Scandal
-
Chukwuka Okoroafor
I listened to the interview that Nnamdi Kanu had with the Malaysian radio station and I heard something very profound in his statement. He admitted that any new civil war in a Biafran state would be a family affair and that oil will be at the center of it all. This goes back to my past posts that everything today is driven by who will control oil. Whether it is the Northern elites, neo-Biafrans, or foreign governments/corporations, Vladimir Putin had it right when he said in 2002 that “whoever controls the production, the distribution, and the price of oil controls power in today’s world.” I could see a new civil war or a dictatorship being established by the neo-Biafrans to control the oil and the oil Nigeria has is one of the most valuable types in the world. Kanu obviously knows this intrinsically but at the same time said that there would be peace and development if Biafra is to form. You will either have war or dictatorship/totalitarianism (lack of the freedom that the neo-Biafrans claim they are fighting for). It is interesting to note this. I do know he brought up legitimate points about the state of Nigeria today, but I cannot see Biafra as a fix for most if not all the problems. I know with the current injustices of today and the looming threat of federalized Sharia in the next decade or two (without radical constitutional and structural reform) make Biafra a very tempting proposition.
-
Dan taxi Abdulkareem
So do you want to remain a Nigerian because of what you perceived? And what have you been able to do to stop Nigerian Oil so called that is control by Hausa/fulanies? If you Biafran wants to go its better you do so,and get your Biafra,when war broke out within,then whoever that remains after the war, will live to enjoy the oil. But if you want to live in peace, well its cost less,you can be reasonable like human beings and liver ever in peace
-
Chukwuka Okoroafor
So I saw your profile and the comments you made. I am not accusing you of this but we must remember that neo-Biafran operatives (or foreigners who work for foreign intelligence) can pose as all sorts of people to create the impression of international support for a cause. Assuming that you neither are a neo-Biafran who is acting like a concerned Hausa person (there were a lot of people with Hausa names during the election who seemed overly sympathetic to Jonathan although there is nothing wrong in them supporting Jonathan for reelection) or a foreigner working in the interest of the CIA (The CIA has a policy of breaking up other countries and Nigeria is the juiciest target on the African continent), you said to other posters that ‘we in the North are favored by the system’. You attack Awolowo for stealing money from the Niger-Delta region to develop education in the Western Region (as this is completely false. Cocoa revenue was used to do this as oil was not exported in sufficient quantities at that time) and you are selling the narrative that the North benefitted all these years. That too is false. The elites in the North and South were the ones that benefited from the oil money. The general public has not. If you really were from Nigeria as you claim, you would know this. I am sure you were not aware of Vice President Osinbajo’s message to the Northern leaders recently telling them that they have lost visionary leaders and now have aimless politicians. Will you tell me that the North benefited when HDI of them are among the lowest in the world or are you just here to incite an uprising in Nigeria by your past statements? I have no apologies for my position on Nigeria or the Biafran agitations. Aside from a federalization of Sharia or another pogrom against the Igbo people, I will not support any such movements. When you have South Sudan, Eritrea, Pakistan, 8 of the 15 republics of the former Soviet Union, Bosnia, and Serbia as examples of how secessions lead to more secessions or civil wars, it is hard for me to support such a thing. Believe me, Biafra will be worse than South Sudan. Thank you for reading my response and taking it all in. Be blessed now.
-
-
I listened to the interview that Nnamdi Kanu had with the Malaysian radio station and I heard something very profound in his statement. He admitted that any new civil war in a Biafran state would be a family affair and that oil will be at the center of it all. This goes back to my past posts that everything today is driven by who will control oil. Whether it is the Northern elites, neo-Biafrans, or foreign governments/corporations, Vladimir Putin had it right when he said in 2002 that “whoever controls the production, the distribution, and the price of oil controls power in today’s world.” I could see a new civil war or a dictatorship being established by the neo-Biafrans to control the oil and the oil Nigeria has is one of the most valuable types in the world. Kanu obviously knows this intrinsically but at the same time said that there would be peace and development if Biafra is to form. You will either have war or dictatorship/totalitarianism (lack of the freedom that the neo-Biafrans claim they are fighting for). It is interesting to note this. I do know he brought up legitimate points about the state of Nigeria today, but I cannot see Biafra as a fix for most if not all the problems. I know with the current injustices of today and the looming threat of federalized Sharia in the next decade or two (without radical constitutional and structural reform) make Biafra a very tempting proposition.
-
Dan taxi Abdulkareem
So do you want to remain a Nigerian because of what you perceived? And what have you been able to do to stop Nigerian Oil so called that is control by Hausa/fulanies? If you Biafran wants to go its better you do so,and get your Biafra,when war broke out within,then whoever that remains after the war, will live to enjoy the oil. But if you want to live in peace, well its cost less,you can be reasonable like human beings and liver ever in peace
-
Chukwuka Okoroafor
So I saw your profile and the comments you made. I am not accusing you of this but we must remember that neo-Biafran operatives (or foreigners who work for foreign intelligence) can pose as all sorts of people to create the impression of international support for a cause. Assuming that you neither are a neo-Biafran who is acting like a concerned Hausa person (there were a lot of people with Hausa names during the election who seemed overly sympathetic to Jonathan although there is nothing wrong in them supporting Jonathan for reelection) or a foreigner working in the interest of the CIA (The CIA has a policy of breaking up other countries and Nigeria is the juiciest target on the African continent), you said to other posters that ‘we in the North are favored by the system’. You attack Awolowo for stealing money from the Niger-Delta region to develop education in the Western Region (as this is completely false. Cocoa revenue was used to do this as oil was not exported in sufficient quantities at that time) and you are selling the narrative that the North benefitted all these years. That too is false. The elites in the North and South were the ones that benefited from the oil money. The general public has not. If you really were from Nigeria as you claim, you would know this. I am sure you were not aware of Vice President Osinbajo’s message to the Northern leaders recently telling them that they have lost visionary leaders and now have aimless politicians. Will you tell me that the North benefited when HDI of them are among the lowest in the world or are you just here to incite an uprising in Nigeria by your past statements? I have no apologies for my position on Nigeria or the Biafran agitations. Aside from a federalization of Sharia or another pogrom against the Igbo people, I will not support any such movements. When you have South Sudan, Eritrea, Pakistan, 8 of the 15 republics of the former Soviet Union, Bosnia, and Serbia as examples of how secessions lead to more secessions or civil wars, it is hard for me to support such a thing. Believe me, Biafra will be worse than South Sudan. Thank you for reading my response and taking it all in. Be blessed now.
-
So do you want to remain a Nigerian because of what you perceived? And what have you been able to do to stop Nigerian Oil so called that is control by Hausa/fulanies? If you Biafran wants to go its better you do so,and get your Biafra,when war broke out within,then whoever that remains after the war, will live to enjoy the oil. But if you want to live in peace, well its cost less,you can be reasonable like human beings and liver ever in peace
-
Chukwuka Okoroafor
So I saw your profile and the comments you made. I am not accusing you of this but we must remember that neo-Biafran operatives (or foreigners who work for foreign intelligence) can pose as all sorts of people to create the impression of international support for a cause. Assuming that you neither are a neo-Biafran who is acting like a concerned Hausa person (there were a lot of people with Hausa names during the election who seemed overly sympathetic to Jonathan although there is nothing wrong in them supporting Jonathan for reelection) or a foreigner working in the interest of the CIA (The CIA has a policy of breaking up other countries and Nigeria is the juiciest target on the African continent), you said to other posters that ‘we in the North are favored by the system’. You attack Awolowo for stealing money from the Niger-Delta region to develop education in the Western Region (as this is completely false. Cocoa revenue was used to do this as oil was not exported in sufficient quantities at that time) and you are selling the narrative that the North benefitted all these years. That too is false. The elites in the North and South were the ones that benefited from the oil money. The general public has not. If you really were from Nigeria as you claim, you would know this. I am sure you were not aware of Vice President Osinbajo’s message to the Northern leaders recently telling them that they have lost visionary leaders and now have aimless politicians. Will you tell me that the North benefited when HDI of them are among the lowest in the world or are you just here to incite an uprising in Nigeria by your past statements? I have no apologies for my position on Nigeria or the Biafran agitations. Aside from a federalization of Sharia or another pogrom against the Igbo people, I will not support any such movements. When you have South Sudan, Eritrea, Pakistan, 8 of the 15 republics of the former Soviet Union, Bosnia, and Serbia as examples of how secessions lead to more secessions or civil wars, it is hard for me to support such a thing. Believe me, Biafra will be worse than South Sudan. Thank you for reading my response and taking it all in. Be blessed now.
So I saw your profile and the comments you made. I am not accusing you of this but we must remember that neo-Biafran operatives (or foreigners who work for foreign intelligence) can pose as all sorts of people to create the impression of international support for a cause. Assuming that you neither are a neo-Biafran who is acting like a concerned Hausa person (there were a lot of people with Hausa names during the election who seemed overly sympathetic to Jonathan although there is nothing wrong in them supporting Jonathan for reelection) or a foreigner working in the interest of the CIA (The CIA has a policy of breaking up other countries and Nigeria is the juiciest target on the African continent), you said to other posters that ‘we in the North are favored by the system’. You attack Awolowo for stealing money from the Niger-Delta region to develop education in the Western Region (as this is completely false. Cocoa revenue was used to do this as oil was not exported in sufficient quantities at that time) and you are selling the narrative that the North benefitted all these years. That too is false. The elites in the North and South were the ones that benefited from the oil money. The general public has not. If you really were from Nigeria as you claim, you would know this. I am sure you were not aware of Vice President Osinbajo’s message to the Northern leaders recently telling them that they have lost visionary leaders and now have aimless politicians. Will you tell me that the North benefited when HDI of them are among the lowest in the world or are you just here to incite an uprising in Nigeria by your past statements? I have no apologies for my position on Nigeria or the Biafran agitations. Aside from a federalization of Sharia or another pogrom against the Igbo people, I will not support any such movements. When you have South Sudan, Eritrea, Pakistan, 8 of the 15 republics of the former Soviet Union, Bosnia, and Serbia as examples of how secessions lead to more secessions or civil wars, it is hard for me to support such a thing. Believe me, Biafra will be worse than South Sudan. Thank you for reading my response and taking it all in. Be blessed now.
