Commentary- Does Pope Benedict XVI Forget The Congo Holocaust- 30 Million Murdered!
May 11 2009; -anonymous slave
In the last few days once again we have seen Pope Benedict XVI make numerous stops in the Middle East [1] and keep offering up

Hands as trophies during Leopold's massacre of Congo Republic
prayers and wails in regard to the tale of the Jewish Holocaust, in which accounts put the dead toll between 6-8 million. His first rejection of this event was one not too hard to forget, shortly after he entered office when he was reported to have asked God why He sat still and did nothing and allowed such event occur. His words at Auschuwitz in 2006- “Why, Lord did you remain silent?..” [2] But the question is- does the Pope forget Africa? Are the Holocausts of Africa [3] of the past and present not of importance to the Pope of the world? Or is European-Jewish life more sacred than African life, which includes Jewish blood (Ethiopian, Nigerian, Egyptian and other Jews[4]) and blood of all races of humanity?
Are the occurrence of the African Holocausts, the colonization of Africa and the Slave deportations too distant for the Pope and larger world to remember… or of too little magnitude in comparison? Then King Leopold of Belgium murdered up to 30 million Congolese when he raped Congo in Africa to exploit a great Nation to build his Nation. The population was cut down in his reign from 1885 to 1908 from over 30 million to less than 5 million, those left were women and children with their hands amputated. [5] The history is all too vivid in our memories of their using hands of Congolese as trophies in their quest to ravage the rubber resource of Congo, or is it not? Indeed, contrary to what the Pope said at Auschuwitz, the European-Jewish Holocaust was well precedented and surpassed by the African Holocaust, of cataclysmic proportion. And monuments of the atrocious Leopold are proudly displayed all over Belgium, to continue commemorating the pain, and endorsing the reality of the indignation and un-repentance. Statues that should be smashed into a thousand pieces.
“…The baskets of severed hands, set down at the feet of the European post commanders, became the symbol of the Congo Free State. , The collection of hands became an end in itself. Force Publique soldiers brought them to the stations in place of rubber; they even went out to harvest them instead of rubber, They became a sort of currency. They came to be used to make up for shortfalls in rubber quotas, to replace, the people who were demanded for the forced labor gangs; and the Force Publique soldiers were paid their bonuses on the basis of how many hands they collected…”[6]

Or is it because of the European-Jewish account of gas-chambers and being burned? Then when we look at the entire African continent, and how between 100-300 million Africans were deported and killed en route their destination in the 300 plus year ‘Code Noir’ authorized, Trans-Atlantic slave deportation [7] And we remember stories of incendiraism, as narrated below occurring in Nigeria and all over Africa, in the account given by Captain Lord Esme Gordon Lenox,- ‘With The West African Frontier Force’ in the ‘Bequest of Edwin Conat‘, from the Harvard library.[8]
His words-
“…Towards evening a timid looking native turned up in a canoe and informed us that he was the chief of the town. We asked where all his people had gone, and he told us they had all made off as they were too frightened of the soldiers to remain at home. he like the others, promised to give us assistance, and we told him that if he did not his town will be burnt……we stormed down to Amassana, which was a town supposed to be friendly and fined them 25 goats and 20 chickens for non-assistance, then returned to Agbeni and burned half...October 1st was spent in continuance of yesterdays incendiraism by burning every town or farm we could see. I shudder to think of how many houses we have destroyed in these two days. On our way back to Egbbeddi in the afternoon we passed by Sabagreia and told our old friend Chief Ijor that most likely we should burn down Sabagreia the next day….”
So we ask, why is it that the Pope of the world has so far chosen to forget the more horrendous Holocausts of the entire continent of Africa? Perhaps it has something to do with the Papal involvement in the Slave deportations as his predecessor Pope’s were known to have freely owned and exchanged African slaves-
“…The Pope (Innocent VIII) was sent a hundred fine Moorish slaves, whom he distributed among the Curia and to friends, and granted Ferdinand II of Aragon the epithet “Catholic Majesty.”…” [9]

Imposing statue of King Leopold II on his horse, proudly found at Place du Trône surrounding the Royal Palace in Brussels, Belgium. How about a Hitler statue of same sort in Germany?
But this also should not be the reason why the Pope forgets African Holocausts in his sermons, because he is not the Pope’s in question, and his participation in the German Holocaust has been understood and forgiven with his clear statements of his rejection of it, so a similar approach will certainly also be acceptable by the world for the involvement of his church in the largest and longest ever known atrocity of genocidal proportion in human history that still leaves the continent psychologically destroyed and unable to recover. Hand cutting still practiced by the terrorized people of Congo, and the act of selling your clan, imbibed by the colonial demand for sales at the risk of having your village burned to the ground, still leaving the Africans crippled.
Or is it because Africa got reparation while Israel did not…oops it seems I put that the wrong way around, it is Israel that was granted reparations from Germany and from the world, including the apportioning to them of the land they now have, and it is Africa that is yet to even get a ’sorry’, or an acknowledgment that they are humans after all and not 3/5ths a person on par with animals as is still written, though abrogated in the US constitution.
So our question remains- why forget Africa? perhaps we ask too soon, he has only been in office a few years, the Pope will soon visit and then he will yell and ask God also why he allowed this holocaust occur and why He still allows Africa, the land of the first man and a land of the greatest technological, cultural and economic revolutionizing developments in the history of the world, continue to be ravaged and exploited by un-free trade impositions, guns and toxic waste dumping, and new world slavery. Oh, once again, my error, he did already visit Africa [10] that was where he made his very famous speech on banning the use of condoms.
Maybe we must wait till he visits the Caribbean Islands, Jamaica, Haiti and the like, Nations built simply and exclusively for slavery, then he will remember and cry out.
Leopold II
Comments (2)


I shudder at the thought that King Leopold’s descendants continue to enjoy wealth that was derived from innocent, congolese blood.
The Belgian King Leopold II’s rubber gang killed 10 Million Africans between 1885 and 1908 in his personal colony Congo Free State. Being a Belgian does not make me resposible for that man’ s crimes, but I am not proud of our royal family still owning a fortune accumulated by killing and robbing in Africa.
I am not proud of most Belgians’ lacking the motivation to urge our present king to give the suffering Congolese people their money back, and, at least, apologise. I am ashamed to learn that some of our politicians have given priority to drawing Turkey’s attention to its Armenian genocide, while Leopold II still has a statue and street names here. Most people do condemn Leopold’s crimes, but seem to think it all happened very long ago and it’s too late anyway.
I cannot blame Turks for adopting a similar indifference about the Armenians, and I cannot even blame them for expressing fervent negationism and indignation as long as Belgian Vergangenheitsbewältigung is at the bottom of our own priority list. However, the popularity of negationism among Turks is worrying and more relevant for Turkish accession to the EU than one might think. For the victims of the genocide were Christians, and the killers Muslims. Could it have been the other way round if the former had been the majority and the latter the minority? We will never know.
To me, in a country that had been theirs and the Greeks’ before the Turkish invasion, and after seven centuries of dhimmi-status and devchirme, the Armenians’ revolt against oppression does look somewhat more understandable than the Turks’ cruelties, but whatever judgement we may be tempted to make, it might be wiser to let bygones be bygones now that we can come together. Therefore, like most Europeans conscious of fourteen centuries of attacks against Christendom by the followers of Mohammed, I would like to know if the apparent bygones are real bygones.
Christians have killed Millions, and their violence was often encouraged by the churches, in a complete denial of Jesus’ teachings/example of unconditional non-violence (unlike Mohammed’s and the Coran’s relative importance in Islamic practice, Jesus’ example, not Biblical law, is what Christians follow). Muslims, however, can justify their killing of 120 Million Africans, 80 Million Hindus and 60 Million Christians by Coranic commandments to wage Jihad.
Neither Christians nor Atheists in Europe have to obey any commandment to kill each other. I have been told that more than a third of young Turks no longer believe in the Coran. Fine, let’s come together! But what about the other two thirds who believe that the orders to kill Christians and Atheists are the word of God? What about those who think Europeans deserve no better but to burn in the flames of everlasting hellfire?
My Turkish friends, we have no Holy Book that tells us to kill you, to cheat you and to discriminate against you. I think most Europeans would like to know whether you still believe in the one you have. Should you consider bringing its countless blessings to the infidel: please stay where you are! Why should Europe’s land be inherited by the followers of Mohammed? In dozens of defensive wars against Muslim agression, millions of Iberians, Greeks, Bulgarians, Russians, Serbs and Hungarians shed their blood for it. If they had not, the West would, by now, have invented about as many watches, computers, motor cars, cameras, washing machines, airplanes and mobile phones as the glorious muslim civilisation has. Our continent would, in the past centuries, have contributed to science, philosophy and art no more than the Ottoman Empire.
You have abolished that Empire; now throw away your book! And we will all know if you have! After throwing it away, you may or may not, recognise the plight of Christians in the Empire and the Republic, including the Armenian genocide. But you will certainly not want to keep your flag. I have read somewhat different stories about its origins, but they all refer to that terrible 29th of May 1453, when Mehmet II conquered the capital of Christendom. If a Christian nation, after invading Mekka, after transforming its mosques into churches, after killing, enslaving or chasing the population from the peninsula, and after creating a flag to commemorate this glorious moment, asked, even after centuries, to become a member of the Arab League and raise this blood-coloured flag, symbolising Mekka’s destruction and invasion, side by side with the flags of the Arab countries, would the Arabs be as nice as Europe is now? Would the Turks be if such a request was submitted to them? I am sure Turks do not want to add insult to century-old injury. You will be nice enough to change your flag, won’t you?
http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/105144